www.sitepoint.com – Keyword Density, How much is too much? – Marketing – SitePoint Forums | Web Development & Design Community

I have my target keyword phrase currently sitting at 8% (Including Title, Meta Data, A tag, h1, paragraph etc..) keyword density for a new site. Is that too high? What should my target be to not look spammy.

Page Meta Tags

description I have my target keyword phrase currently sitting at 8% (Including Title, Meta Data, A tag, h1, paragraph etc..) keyword density for a new site. Is that too high? What should my target be to not look spammy.
discourse_theme_ids 495
discourse_current_homepage latest
generator Discourse 2.6.0.beta3 – https://github.com/discourse/discourse version 5157e3b6e3c0253314be428f98b9f5f65bcb361e
theme-color #ffffff
viewport width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, minimum-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes, viewport-fit=cover
discourse-base-uri /community
fragment !
twitter:card summary
twitter:image https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/sitepoint/original/3X/c/f/cf11b3ed553d6c359d3dcc08377cc4b121fe8bf0.png
twitter:url https://www.sitepoint.com/community/t/keyword-density-how-much-is-too-much/78198
twitter:title Keyword Density, How much is too much?
twitter:description I have my target keyword phrase currently sitting at 8% (Including Title, Meta Data, A tag, h1, paragraph etc…) keyword density for a new site. Is that too high? What should my target be to not look spammy.

Page Headers

0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK
server nginx
date Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:52:21 GMT
content-type text/html; charset=utf-8
vary Accept-Encoding
x-xss-protection 1; mode=block
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-download-options noopen
x-permitted-cross-domain-policies none
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
x-discourse-route topics/show
cache-control no-cache, no-store
x-discourse-cached true
x-request-id 536ce788-d9f6-4cbf-9068-a73445115550
x-discourse-trackview 1
discourse-proxy-id app-router-tiehunter02.sjc5
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
connection close
X-Frame-Options sameorigin

Keyword Frequency

much 148
too 147
keyword 35
density 34
am 22
september 20
it 20
be 14
that 14
no 13

Keyword Cloud

Keyword Density How much is too Marketing SitePoint Forums Web Development amp Design Community Log In JordashTalon September am I have my target keyword phrase currently sitting at Including Title Meta Data A tag h paragraph etc density for a new site Is that high What should be to not look spammy system Many SEO experts consider the optimum percent Using more than could considered search spam The formula calculate your on web page purposes Nkr Tkn citation needed where how many times you repeated specific and total words in analyzed text This will result value When calculating sure ignore html tags other embedded which actually appear of once it published alisha recent post SEOChat there was Unimportant Ranking Factors Google wherein mentioned do work anymore You need focus writing clear user friendly Stevie D read does Does flow naturally or seem stilted use range vocabulary synonyms pronouns like keyword-stuffed bot-fest numerical an appropriate vary from one another depending type content style best test well reads surajdeshmukh any must then wise appears zara important can make change ranking even its lower decrease if getting relevant back linking with anchor link JJMcClure lt snip gt Sorry didn t catch repeat r take fix replace light bulb lightbulb lamp lampbulb lighting switch lightswitch fluorescent tube theseoguys Real pay no attention Write audience Do write engines rahulteak but lots blogs articles got idea using really good It save our all allysonstewart depends engine each has own preference There isn set amount some suggest about Theseoguys right keywords approx every Keywords injected forcefully whether while are as per necessity article never this most basic strategy rest comes afterwards leapharris factor between get list tools check better include ideal preeti NO mad such thing If so stupid fooled into thinking particularly certain topic just because word same would completely useless easily spammed point ve had enough From now anyone who says aim shot No questions arguments akhomiyar optimal excessive term time definitely up Focus readability par excellence intended requires Don try Search Engines real trick provide something extra As far know exceed Personally krobinsonrikhav say warn next Home Categories FAQ Guidelines Terms Service Privacy Policy Powered by Discourse viewed JavaScript enabled Themes Podcast Articles Premium